Our Climate

Climate change	?	Yes
Is that because of humans	?	No
Is that because of our galaxy	?	Yes

Read here the honest story

A little astronomy will make this clear.

A circle has 1 centre and 1 radius.
Each point of the circle has the same distance from the center, the radius.
If the sun were the centre, every point of the circle received the same radiant heat from the sun.

Earth's orbit around the sun is not a circle but an ellipse.

An ellipse has 2 foci and 2 rays.
Each point of the ellipse has the same value as the sum of the distance to the 2 foci.
The sun is 1 of the 2 focuses of the Earth's orbit.
The shortest distance from a point in the ellipse to the sun is called: Perihelion.
The longest distance from a point in the ellipse to the sun is called: Aphelium.
The closer to the Perihelion the more radiant heat from the sun.
The Earth is now moving in its orbit towards Perihelion.

In addition, the Earth’s movement around the sun is affected by, among other things, :
a. The precession of the earth’s axis ( movement of the earth’s axis relative to the sun ) every 25,800 years
b. the nutation (position of the earth’s axis) every 18.6 years
c. quasiperiodic movement ( polar movement )
d. changing rotation speed of the earth
e. changing tilt of the Earth’s axis over a period of 41,000 years
All this leads to 2 cyclical periods of 413,000 and 100,000 years.

Moreover, our SUN is changing.

The Danish professor Henrik Svensmark has conducted lengthy research into this.
(Source: Hans Labohm and translated by J. Aart) (home.hccnet.nl/j.aart/svensmark.html)

Climate change due to cosmic rays

In 1996, Svensmark discovered that the sun has an amazing influence on the formation of clouds: fast high-energy particles from exploding stars - called cosmic rays - help to form clouds.
When the Sun is active, the magnetic field blocks these cosmic rays so that fewer of these particles from deep space can reach Earth.
This has an effect on the formation of clouds on our planet, which in turn affects the temperature.
With high solar activity, the earth can become warmer.
Low solar activity means that more cosmic rays reach the Earth, which stimulates cloud formation - resulting in a cooling.
The magnetic power of the sun has doubled in the 20th century, and this phenomenon may explain much of the warming.

With the big climate conference in December 2009 just around the corner, Copenhagen was the epicenter of the climate discussion.
It was all the more surprising that a different sound came from this city.
That sound came from Professor Henrik Svensmark, director of the Center for Sun-Climate Research at the Danish Space Research Institute in Copenhagen.
Together with Nigel Calder, he is the author of 'The Chilling Stars'.
Henrik Svensmark questions the greenhouse theory.
He attributes global warming to the massive emission of carbon dioxide or CO2 from the burning of coal, oil and gas.
The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC) in particular is calling for drastic reductions in CO2 emissions to avert the danger of melting polar ice caps and rising sea levels.
Svensmark does not deny that CO2 has a warming effect, but according to him, the influence of the sun is much greater.

The future climate is unpredictable

Global warming has stopped and cooling has begun.
No climate model has predicted this cooling.
On the contrary, the climate of the future cannot be predicted because we do not know how the sun behaves.

perioden

How cosmic rays trigger the formation of clouds.

Central to Henrik Svensmark's theory is cosmic rays.
Charged, high-energy particles are released when stars explode violently at the end of their lives.
These particles are whizzing through the universe at tremendous speed and are also hitting the earth.
Once they arrive in the atmosphere, they promote the formation of clouds.
These provide extra cooling because clouds reflect the sun's radiation.
How much cosmic rays penetrate the atmosphere is determined by the sun.
Every eleven years, it goes through an activity cycle that can be read from the number of dark spots on the solar surface.
A maximum of sunspots is accompanied by violent eruptions on the Sun, in which hot gas is ejected into space together with powerful magnetic fields.
They block cosmic rays in a large area around the sun, causing fewer clouds to form and the earth to receive more solar radiation.
Conversely, more cosmic rays reach Earth when the Sun is in a quiescent phase.
The resulting positive effect on cloud formation keeps the earth relatively cool.
Three hundred years ago, during the Little Ice Age, Europe was in the midst of such a cool period that coincided with a remarkable lack of sunspots.
In the twentieth century, on the other hand, the sun was hyperactive and global temperatures rose by 0.8 degrees.
According to Svensmark, the fact that this recent warming is indeed due to the sun is evident from the relationship between the number of sunspots and cloud cover.
Satellite measurements show that cloud cover goes up and down in line with the sunspot cycle.
That sums up the view of Professor Henrik Svensmark, climate researcher from Copenhagen.
When Svensmark first presented his theory at a scientific conference in 1996, the chairman of the IPCC called it "extremely naïve and irresponsible".
Svensmark did not let this dissuade him and in his book Cosmic Climate: Why the Earth Is Really Warming he makes his theory accessible to a large audience.

wolk

According to Danish climate scientist Henrik Svensmark, cosmic rays have a direct influence on the amount of clouds in the lower 3 kilometers of the atmosphere.

Twice the Sun:

left with sunspots (2001), right without, as now in 2009

When Svensmark began to express his views, which deviated from the IPCC consensus, he found himself blacklisted.
From that moment on, his articles were rejected by peer-reviewed journals such as Nature.
For a scientist, publication is a necessity of life.
This means that he had to pay a high price for publicising his alternative views.
Svensmark is not alone in this.
Many other climate sceptics have similar experiences, which in some cases led to 'voluntary' or non-'voluntary' resignations from the institutions where they worked.
Long live the freedom of science!
This is confirmed by: https://www.klimaatfeiten.nl/oorzaken/zonneactiviteit-en-bewolking

Solar activity and cloud cover

Clouds have an important influence on the temperature on Earth.
It turns out that variations in solar activity (number of sunspots) affect the amount of cosmic rays, which in turn determines the amount of cloud cover.

It is clear that cloud cover plays a crucial role in climate change.
But the question is: how is it that the average amount of (low) clouds changes?
The theory of the Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark is central to this.
A good explanation and substantiation of his theory can be read in the GWPF report 'Force Majeur: The Sun's Role in Climate Change'.
His presentation on YouTube at the beginning of this year is also very worthwhile.
According to Svensmark, changes in the cloud cover are largely caused by the amount of cosmic rays.
Cosmic rays are a collective term for particles with a high energy (ionizing radiation) from the universe.
When the atmosphere cools to the point of condensation, a small disturbance is still needed to initiate the condensation.
A tiny particle of dust, for example, or a charged particle of the cosmic rays of the sun.
We call these condensation nuclei.
When these are absent, condensation and cloud formation are absent for a longer period of time (supersaturation).
The more condensation nuclei, the easier it is for clouds to form.
For example, cosmic rays can promote cloud formation.

In this figure from the GWPF report, the correlation between cosmic rays and the amount of cloud cover is clearly visible.
clodcover

The relationship between cosmic rays and amount of cloud cover

The amount of cosmic rays, in turn, is affected by solar activity.
This is not about the amount of sunlight, but about the changes in the sun's magnetic field.
In periods when the Sun's magnetic field is stronger, cosmic rays are less likely to enter the atmosphere, clouds are less likely to develop and global warming occurs.
If the Sun's magnetic field is less strong, the reverse occurs.
This also explains the previously observed correlation between solar activity and temperature.

zonactiviteit

The Svensmark effect under the influence of solar activity

In this figure, effect is summarized: greater solar activity is associated with an increase in the Sun's magnetic field.
This results in less cosmic radiation and therefore less ionization.
As a result, fewer particles are formed that can grow into nuclei on which condensation can take place.
This in turn leads to less clouds and higher temperatures.
In the analogy of the clouds as a sunshade, you can say that the degree of solar activity determines how far the awning is open or closed.

correlatie

The correlation between solar activity and temperature based on research in caves in Oman

Svensmark's theory is confirmed not only in experimental setups, but also in observations.
There appears to be a remarkable correlation between temperature and solar activity over different time periods.
Below is a comparison of the development of the temperature with the solar activity over a period from 6200 to 9600 years ago, based on a study in caves in Oman.
The green part indicates the temperature deviation, the blue part the (reverse) amount of solar activity.
The strong correlation is clearly visible.
The correlation between solar activity and temperature based on research in caves in Oman.
Svensmark's theory is not without controversy among climate scientists.
The story itself is well scientifically substantiated, but it goes against the still widely held view that human CO2 is the dominant cause of global warming.
Nevertheless, there is increasing support for his conclusions.
An interesting example is the renowned scientist Dr. Rex Fleming.
After leaving NOAA, he also came to the conclusion in a recent study that the temperature on Earth is related to the Sun's magnetic field and the amount of cloud cover.
He thus confirms Svensmark's analysis.

NASA has also reported that climate change is partly due to the sun. source: NASA

NASA admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, and NOT because of SUVs and fossil fuels.

For more than 60 years, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has known that the changes occurring to planetary weather patterns are completely natural and normal.
But the space agency, for whatever reason, has chosen to let the man-made global warming hoax persist and spread, to the detriment of human freedom.

It was the year 1958, to be precise, when NASA first observed that changes in the solar orbit of the earth, along with alterations to the earth's axial tilt, are both responsible for what climate scientists today have dubbed as "warming" (or "cooling," depending on their agenda).
In no way, shape, or form are humans warming or cooling the planet by driving SUVs or eating beef, in other words.

But NASA has thus far failed to set the record straight, and has instead chosen to sit silently back and watch as liberals freak out about the world supposedly ending in 12 years because of too much livestock, or too many plastic straws.

In the year 2000, NASA did publish information on its Earth Observatory website about the Milankovitch Climate Theory, revealing that the planet is, in fact, changing due to extraneous factors that have absolutely nothing to do with human activity.
But, again, this information has yet to go mainstream, some 19 years later, which is why deranged, climate-obsessed leftists have now begun to claim that we really only have 18 months left before the planet dies from an excess of carbon dioxide (CO2).

The truth, however, is much more along the lines of what Serbian astrophysicist Milutin Milankovitch, after whom the Milankovitch Climate Theory is named, proposed about how the seasonal and latitudinal variations of solar radiation that hit the earth in different ways, and at different times, have the greatest impact on earth's changing climate patterns.

The below two images (by Robert Simmon, NASA GSFC) help to illustrate this, with the first showing earth at a nearly zero orbit, and the second showing earth at a 0.07 orbit.
This orbital change is depicted by the eccentric, oval shape in the second image, which has been intentionally exaggerated for the purpose of showing the massive change in distance that occurs between the earth and the sun, depending on whether it is at perihelion or aphelion.

Variation in Orbital Eccentricity

eccentricitiy = 0

eccentricitiy = .5

"Even the maximum eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit - 0.07 - it would be impossible to show at the resolution of a web page," notes the Hal Turner Radio Show.
"Even so, at the current eccentricity of .017, the Earth is 5 million kilometers closer to Sun at perihelion than at aphelion."

For more related news about climate change and global warming from an independent, non-establishment perspective, be sure to check out ClimateScienceNews.com.

The biggest factor affecting earth's climate is the SUN

As for earth's obliquity, or its change in axial tilt, the below two images (Robert Simmon, NASA GSFC) show the degree to which the earth can shift on both its axis and its rotational orientation.
At the higher tilts, earth’s seasons become much more extreme, while at lower tilts they become much more mild.
A similar situation exists for earth’s rotational axis, which depending on which hemisphere is pointed at the sun during perihelion, can greatly impact the seasonal extremes between the two hemispheres.

Variation in Axel Obliquity

nutatie

precession

precession

Based on these different variables, Milankovitch was able to come up with a comprehensive mathematical model that is able to compute surface temperatures on earth going way back in time, and the conclusion is simple:
Earth's climate has always been changing, and is in a constant state of flux due to no fault of our own as human beings.

When Milankovitch first put forward his model, it went ignored for nearly half a century.
Then, in 1976, a study published in the journal Science confirmed that Milankovitch's theory is, in fact, accurate, and that it does correspond to various periods of climate change that have occurred throughout history.
In 1982, six years after this study was published, the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences adopted Milankovitch's theory as truth, declaring that:

"... orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism of climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by far the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the lower atmosphere of Earth."

If we had to sum the whole thing up in one simple phrase, it would be this :
The biggest factor influencing weather and climate patterns on earth is the sun, period.
Depending on the earth's position to the sun at any given time, climate conditions are going to vary dramatically, and even create drastic abnormalities that defy everything that humans thought they knew about how the earth worked.

"The climate change debate is not about science.
It is an effort to impose political and economic controls on the population by the elite,"
Wrote one commenter at the Hal Turner Radio Show.

"And it’s another way to divide the population against itself, with some who believe in man-made global warming and some who don't, i.e. divide and conquer."

You can read the full Hal Turner Radio Show report at this link
( https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/nasa-climate-change-and-global-warming-caused-by-changes-in-earth-s-solar-orbit-and-axial-tilt-not-man-made-causes )
Sources for this article include:
HalTurnerRadioShow.com
NaturalNews.com
BBC.com

So it is quite normal that climate changes take place, it has been that way for a very long time.
In ancient times, there was no CO2 or nitrogen caused by humans.

The heat/cold periods in the past

Just to clarify: itrogen (N2) is not harmful to humans and the environment, but nitrogen compounds are harmful. However, this is used under the heading: nitrogen.

People who keep shouting with a loud voice that climate change is our fault and that we must stop CO2 and nitrogen emissions are only right to a very small extent.

Stopping the emission of CO2 and nitrogen (by which we mean nitrogen compounds) really has very little effect.
The forces of nature are much greater.

However, these measures greatly affect our living environment, such as :
The agricultural sector, housing and road construction, economy, etc.

Stop this madness and pass on the honest story of the real cause of climate change to our politicians and judges.

Our Climate

Climate change

?

Yes

Is that because of humans

?

No

Is that because of our galaxy

?